| Edward St John Daniel was
born at the family home 1 Windsor Terrace, Clifton, Bristol on 17th
January 1837, the first child of a well-known Bristol attorney, Edward
Daniel. His mother, Barbara Bedford, was the granddaughter of Henry
Beauchamp St John, the 12th Baron St John, and there is evidence that
Edward was known as "St John" (sinjon) by his family. Edward
St John Daniel was also the first cousin 12 times removed of Henry
Tudor, King Henry VII (1457-1509), through their common ancestor,
Henry's grandmother, Margaret Beauchamp (c. 1410-1482).
Daniel's mother died shortly after
giving birth to his third sister, Lucy Gertrude, in February 1850, when
Daniel was barely thirteen. The following year, just before his 14th
birthday, Daniel joined HMS Victory as a Naval Cadet. His naval
education continued during a 12 months spell in HMS Dauntless, which was
on detached service. In 1852, he joined the Flag-Ship HMS Winchester
under Capt. Granville Loch and soon saw his first action during the
second Burmese War. For this service he received the India General
Service Medal, with clasp for "Pegu". During his time in
Burma, he developed chronic leg ulcers, which affected him for the rest
of his life.
In 1853, Daniel joined HMS Diamond as
a Midshipman, under the celebrated Capt. William Peel, RN, third son of
the British statesman Sir Robert Peel, founder of the modern police
force. HMS Diamond was sent to the Black Sea at the outbreak of the
Crimean War in 1854, and officers and men from the Diamond formed part
of the Naval Brigade, under Capt. Stephen Lushington of HMS Albion,
which assisted the Army in the land operations. Daniel was appointed ADC
(Aide-de-camp) to Capt. Peel and was, by all accounts, devoted to his
handsome and charismatic leader. In his memoirs, Sir Evelyn Wood, who as
a 17 year old Midshipman became Daniel's fellow ADC to Capt. Peel in May
1855, writes:
"I was evidently much
struck with Captain Peel's appearance and manners, for I recorded in
boyish language, 'Captain Peel, very intelligent, sharp as a needle; I
never saw a more perfect gentleman.' His looks and bearing were
greatly in his favour, for both in face and figure there was an
appearance of what sporting men, in describing well-bred horses, call
'quality' ... Before the first bombardment, Captain Peel asked
Lieutenant Ridge and Midshipman Daniels (sic) of H.M.S. Diamond, and
Lieutenant Douglas and Midshipman Wood of the Queen, to disregard fire
in the battery, by always walking with head up and shoulders back and
without undue haste. He himself was a splendid example. I know that he
felt acutely every shot which passed over him, but the only visible
effect was to make him throw up his head and square his
shoulders." (Wood, 1906, p.26, 42)
In a letter home from the front,
penned on 16th October 1854 (published in the Cambridge Chronicle, 9th
December 1854, p.8, col. 2), Daniel wrote:
"Encamped off
the Walls of Sebastopol, Oct. 16,
"My dearest * * *
I dare say you are surprised that you have not had a line from me, but
I have not had a minute to myself for the last month. We are encamped
with a thousand of our blue jackets and we have twenty of our guns
ashore. We have had a good many shots fired at us, but none of our men
(Oct. 16), have been wounded. I am the Captain's aide-de-camp. I have
been obliged to provide myself with a horse as we are six miles
from Admiral Sir E. Lyons and very often I have to go to him twice
a-day, and after that to go in the trenches all night with the
Captain. Thank God, our battery will be completed by daylight to
morrow. I am very much obliged to you for the pistols. Remember me to
all. I wish aunt all happiness. Good bye; God bless you all; and if I
am spared will write to you after Sebastopol is taken. - I remain your
ever affectionate,
"ST. JOHN.
DANIEL"
The following day, 17th October 1854,
Daniel and Wood volunteered to bring up boxes of ammunition to the
Diamond Battery, under heavy Russian fire which had disabled the horses.
Daniel "brought in the cartridges and powder without receiving a
scratch, and the battery cheered to a man as the plucky little chap
scrambled over the parapet with his last armful" (Haydon, 1908,
p.49).
On 5th November 1854, at the grim and
bloody Battle of Inkerman (or Inkermann), Daniel was a conspicuous
figure as he rode around the battlefield mounted on his pony. Daniel was
at his Captain's side throughout the day, as Peel led seven separate
charges against the Russians and assisted the Grenadier Guards, who were
cut off in a group, to defend their colours. The Cambridge Chronicle of
9th December 1854 observed:
"Captain Peel, with his
aide-de-camp, was in the thick of the fire; and at one time, when he
was with the Guards, they were completely surrounded by the enemy, but
it appears to me he has a charmed life, as also the little mid, young
Daniel. Both escaped, as I trust they may throughout the campaign, for
they are both made of the right stuff"
(p.8, col. 2)
On 18th June 1855, during the
unsuccessful assault on the Redan at Sebastopol, Capt. Peel, who had
volunteered to lead the first Ladder Party, was shot through his left
arm and fell back, half fainting. Daniel coolly rendered first aid under
a very heavy fire, and brought Peel back to safety – actions that are
said to have saved Peel's life. Although Daniel escaped injury,
"his pistol-case was shot through in two places and his clothes
were cut by several bullets" (Wood, 1906, p.89).
For these three separate acts of
bravery, Daniel was awarded the newly instituted Victoria Cross in the
very first list of citations (London Gazette, 24th February 1857).
Daniel's citation reads:
- "Sir Stephen Lushington
recommends this Officer: -
- 1st. For answering a call for
volunteers to bring in powder to the Battery, from a waggon in
a very exposed position under a destructive fire, a shot
having disabled the horses. (This was reported by Captain
Peel, commanding the Battery at the time.)
- 2nd. For accompanying Captain
Peel at the Battle of Inkermann as Aide-de-camp.
- 3rd. For devotion to his
leader, Captain Peel, on the 18th June, 1855, in
tying a tourniquet on his arm on the glacis of the Redan,
whilst exposed to a very heavy fire.
- (Despatch from Sir S.
Lushington inclosed in letter from Admiral Lord Lyons, 10th
May, 1856)"
At the time, Daniel was the youngest
recipient of the Cross (being just 17 when he won it). Peel also won the
VC for three separate actions in the Crimea. Evelyn Wood, nearly a year
younger than Daniel, was recommended for the Cross, but was not awarded
it. He had left the Royal Navy in 1855 and joined the Army. However, in
October 1858, Lieutenant Wood won the VC in the Indian Mutiny. He
eventually rose to the rank of Field Marshal.
At his speech at the Mansion House on
15th February 1858, Admiral Lord Lyons said:
"All behaved well, but I should
doubt whether there is anything in the annals of chivalry that
surpasses the conduct of Capt. Peel's Aides-de-camp, Messrs. Daniel
and Wood."
Peel himself wrote to his brother,
later Sir Frederick Peel:
"the names of these two heroes
are known throughout the whole army, and I really sometimes thought it
rather inconvenient having two such spirits with me as Messrs. Daniel
and Wood."
Neither Daniel nor Peel was present
when Queen Victoria made the first investitures of the Cross at a
ceremony in Hyde Park on 26th June 1857. They had been sent to China in
the new steam frigate HMS Shannon, which was then diverted to Calcutta
in July 1857 on receiving news of the outbreak of the Indian Mutiny.
Capt. Peel formed a Naval Brigade (the famous "Shannon's
Brigade") which took part in most of the Army operations during the
Mutiny campaign. Daniel was an artillery officer in the Brigade and the
six 8-inch guns from the ship, which had been transported more than a
thousand miles across country, were a decisive factor in the Capture of
Lucknow. Peel was injured in the thigh by a musket ball in the final
assault at Lucknow and, while recovering from his wounds, contracted
smallpox. He died at Cawnpore on 27th April 1858, aged 33.
It seems likely that Daniel was
devastated by the death of his beloved Captain, and it is possible that
this may have contributed to his later downfall and disgrace. However
the next two years saw Daniel achieve the peak of his career. On 13th
July 1858, Daniel was finally presented with his VC (which, with Peel's,
had been forwarded to India from Hong Kong) by Capt. Francis Marten,
commanding Shannon's Brigade, at a special full-dress parade held at
Gyah, Bengal. In a letter to Rear-Admiral Sir Michael Seymour, written
the next day, Capt. Marten describes the occasion:
"The Shannon's Brigade and a
company of Madras Rifles were formed in a hollow square, under a tope
of trees. I stood on a carpet in the centre, with Mr. Daniel on my
right hand, and a Midshipman carried the Cross, with supporters, on my
left.
I read Commodore Watson's letter
ordering me to deliver the Cross to Mr. Daniel, then the letter from
Commander-in-Chief to Commodore Watson on the same subject, after
which I read extract from Government Gazette specifying the acts of
bravery for which the Cross was conferred. I then made to Mr. Daniel a
short address, and as I placed the Cross on his breast the sailors and
troops presented arms, and the band played 'God Save the Queen.'
All the ladies, Military Officers
and Civil Servants were present."
Peel's Cross was later sent to his
brother, Sir Robert Peel, in England (it is now displayed at the
National Maritime Museum, Greenwich).
On 15th September 1859, Daniel was
promoted to Lieutenant. On 24th April 1860, the Duke of Somerset
presented him to Queen Victoria at a Levee held at St James’s Palace.
The Queen is said to have been "much impressed by him".
In addition to the IGS medal and VC,
Daniel's medals and decorations include the Crimea Medal with clasps for
"Sebastopol" and "Inkerman"; Turkish Crimea Medal;
Sardinian Crimea Medal; Turkish Order of Medjidie, 5th Class;
Legion d'Honneur; and Indian Mutiny Medal, with clasps for "Relief
of Lucknow" and "Lucknow".
In 1860, at the age of 23, Edward St
John Daniel was clearly a naval officer of outstanding prospects.
On 24th May 1860, exactly one
month after his presentation to Queen Victoria, Daniel was severely
reprimanded when additional lieutenant on the sloop HMS Wasp for being
twice absent without leave. Wasp was in the English Channel, due to
leave for the Cape of Good Hope where Daniel had been appointed to HMS
Forte. On 9th June he was found in the wardroom in a state of
drunken torpor, when he should have been standing middle watch. A court
martial was held on HMS Impregnable at Devonport on 16th June. Daniel
pleaded guilty to the charge of drunkenness,
but favourable consideration was given to his gallant services and
privations in the Crimea and India. He was sentenced only to be
dismissed from the Wasp and to be placed at the bottom of the list of
lieutenants for a period of two years.
On 26th January 1861,
Daniel was appointed to the screw steam ship HMS Victor Emanuel serving
in the Mediterranean. On 25th June, he was placed under arrest and the
following day the ship proceeded to join Rear Admiral Dacres, Captain of
the Fleet and Senior Officer at Corfu, where Daniel would clearly face
another court martial. At about 10 pm that night, the Master-at-Arms
found that Daniel was missing from the ship. Two men were sent ashore to
effect an arrest, but they could not find him. On 28th June, Daniel was
marked "Run" (i.e., a deserter). Normally such a report would
not be made for two weeks. Because of this fact, the suggestion has been
made by some that Daniel could have been paid off by the Navy in order
to avoid the scandal of what would inevitably have become a high-profile
and embarrassing court martial. Alternatively, Daniel might have left a
note explaining his desertion, although there is no surviving record of
this. In July, his name was removed from the Navy List.
The 15th Article of the Royal Warrant
of 29th January 1856, instituting the Victoria Cross states:
"if any person on whom such
distinction shall be conferred, be convicted of treason, cowardice,
felony, or of any infamous crime, or if he be accused of any such
offence and doth not after a reasonable time surrender himself to be
tried for the same, his name shall forthwith be erased from the
register of individuals upon whom the said decoration shall have been
conferred by an especial warrant under Our Royal Sign Manual."
In the War Office file of
correspondence relating to Daniel's case, the offence for which he was
due to be court-martialled is unspecified. In a minute dated 8th August
1861, Sir George Lewis (Secretary for War) wrote to Sir Edward Lugard
(Under-Secretary, War Department):
"I privately heard of this bad
case, but we now have it on record from the Admiralty that it was
disgraceful, tho’ not specified fully. Prepare Warrant?"
There have been several
suggestions as to what Daniel's "disgraceful offence" may have
been. One suggestion is that Daniel attempted to drown a fellow officer.
Another is that his offence was drunkenness, although it seems unlikely
that, on its own, this would have been considered sufficiently
disgraceful. The clearest evidence, however, is contained in a letter
from Capt. William Clifford of HMS Victor Emanuel to Rear Admiral Dacres,
which states that Daniel was arrested for "taking
indecent liberties with four of the Subordinate Officers of the Victor
Emanuel".
Whatever the full truth of Daniel's
offence, on 4th September 1861 Queen Victoria signed the Royal Warrant
that made Edward St John Daniel the first man to forfeit the Victoria
Cross:
"Whereas it hath been reported
unto us that EDWARD ST. JOHN DANIEL late a Lieutenant in Our Navy,
upon whom we have conferred the decoration of the Victoria Cross, has
been accused of a disgraceful offence, and having evaded enquiry by
desertion from Our Service, his name has been removed from the list of
officers of Our Navy ... Know ye therefore, that we are pleased to
command and declare that the said Edward St. John Daniel shall no
longer be entitled to have his name enrolled in the Registry of
persons on whom we have conferred the said decoration, but shall be
and he is hereby judged and declared to be henceforth removed and
degraded from all and singular rights, privileges and advantages
appertaining thereunto."
Of the 1354 Victoria Crosses that have
been awarded to date, only eight have been forfeited, for offences
ranging from theft of a cow to bigamy. Of these, Daniel was the only
officer and the only Royal Navy man. The last forfeiture was in 1908. In
1920, King George V expressed his displeasure with VC erasures, his
Private Secretary stating in a letter the King's view that:
"no matter the crime committed
by anyone on whom the VC has been conferred, the decoration should not
be forfeited. Even were a VC to be sentenced to be hanged for murder,
he should be allowed to wear his VC on the scaffold."
On 8th February 1868, the Admiralty
loaned Daniel's forfeited VC to a Colonel MacKenzie, collector of naval
and military medals, on condition that "it be returned, if at any
time required". The medal later came into the collection of
Major-General Lord Cheylesmore, where it was displayed at the Royal
United Service Institution in Whitehall. On the death of Lord
Cheylesmore, the medal was sold by auction on 18th July 1930, at
Glendinings in London for forty pounds. The medal has since been sold at
auction several times. The last known sale was at Christies, London on
24th July 1990, where the medal realised 19,800 pounds.
Following his desertion at Corfu,
Daniel somehow made his way back to England. Less than two weeks after
the Royal Warrant of forfeiture was issued, Daniel was aboard the Black
Ball line American clipper Donald McKay in Cobourg Dock, Liverpool,
bound for Melbourne, Australia. The Donald McKay sailed on 16th
September 1861 and arrived in Melbourne on 7th December 1861.
It is believed that Daniel may have
spent his two years in Australia digging in the Gold Fields around
Melbourne. In early 1864, the New Zealand Colonial Government was
enlisting men in Victoria to serve in the Maori Wars. On 18th January
1864, one day after his 27th birthday, Daniel enrolled at
Melbourne as Private E. St. J. Daniel, No 428, No. 5 Company of the
Taranaki Military Settlers. He gave his height as 5' 8" and his
occupation as "Miner". Daniel signed up for three years
service, after which time the NZ Government had promised grants of land
to the Settlers. Daniel sailed to New Zealand aboard the Gresham, which
arrived at New Plymouth, Taranaki Province, North Island on 15th
February 1864. In the following months and years, Daniel's Company took
part in many operations against the Maoris in South Taranaki.
On 8th August 1864, Daniel was
sentenced to 168 hours intensive labour for an unspecified offence. He
was released on 15th August but confined again on 30th August. He was
tried by Regimental Court Martial on 2nd September and released on 13th
October.
On 3rd October 1866, Daniel made
his Last Will and Testament. He gave his domicile as Patea, Taranaki
Province. Daniel left everything
"including the land to which I am entitled in this Colony for my
services as a Military Settler" to his
father. In May 1867, the Taranaki Military Settlers were disbanded when
a temporary peace occurred in the Maori Wars. It has been reported that
Daniel received his land grant, which he sold soon afterwards, but the
evidence for this is unclear and ambiguous.
On 26th November 1867, Daniel enlisted
as a Constable in No. 2 Division of the NZ Armed Constabulary, where he
later achieved the rank of Lance Corporal. In March 1868, disturbances
arose among the Irish Catholic and Protestant communities in the West
Canterbury Goldfields, South Island, after news was received that
"Fenians" (Irish Catholic supporters) had been sent to the
gallows for the murder of police officers in Manchester, England. To
quell these disturbances, members of No. 2 Division, including Daniel,
were sent to Hokitika, a busy, lawless port on the West Coast and the
centre of the riots. The 70-strong force, under Lieut.-Col. Thomas
McDonnell, arrived at Hokitika aboard the steamer St Kilda on 4th April
1868. The danger of insurrection was soon dissipated and, on 21st April,
McDonnell embarked for Patea with half of the force. The remaining
detachment, which included Daniel, had little to do other than guard the
prisoners and frequent the very large number of local hostelries.
On 16th May 1868 Daniel, who according
to later reports had been ill for some time, was admitted to Hokitika
Hospital where he died on 20th May. He was 31 years of age. His death
certificate gives the cause of death as "delirium tremens".
The following day Daniel was given a full military funeral.
"The men ... started from
the barracks at two o’ clock, and proceeded to the landing stage,
Gibson’s Quay, to take charge of the body, and on the coffin being
received, the firing party presented arms, and then, reversing arms,
moved on in front, the remainder of the force counter-marching
inwards. The body having been placed in the hearse, the band took up
its position in front, the firing party leading. In this order the
mournful cortège proceeded with measured tread up Wharf, Camp, and
Revell streets, to the Cemetery, the band playing Handel’s funereal
composition, "The Dead March in Saul." Arrived at the
burial-ground gate, the firing party halted and faced inwards, resting
on their arms reversed. The body was then taken out of the hearse, and
borne by four of the deceased’s comrades through the ranks of the
firing party, the remaining portion of the procession following, the
firing party bringing up the rear. On entering the Cemetery, the body
was met by the Rev. Archdeacon Harper, the officiating clergyman, who
led the way to the grave. Arrived at the grave, the Archdeacon took up
his position at the head, the firing party along one side, resting on
their arms reversed, the remainder of the mourners forming round. The
assemblage at this point was most solemn and imposing, particularly
when the venerable archdeacon, in feeling measured voice, proceeded to
read the beautiful and impressive service for the dead appointed by
the Church of England. At the conclusion of the funeral service the
firing party fired three volleys, the reveille being sounded by the
drums and fifes between each volley, and thus was rendered the last
military honors to the departed soldier. At the conclusion of the
ceremony the men re-formed and returned to barracks. The deceased
during his connection with the Armed Constabulary Force was much
respected by his comrades, and certainly, on this mournful occasion,
everything was done that lay in their power to testify their regard
for their now lost friend and comrade." (West
Coast Times, 22nd May 1868)
Edward St John Daniel was buried
in Grave No. 851, Block 27, Hokitika Cemetery. Back in England, news of
his death was published in the Bristol Times and Mirror on 1st August
1868. No mention was made of the forfeiture of his VC, nor of his
exile in Australia and New Zealand.
In July 1971, concern was expressed
over the overgrown state of Daniel's unmarked grave in Hokitika
Municipal Cemetery. As a result, the Hokitika-Westland branch of the NZ
Returned Services Association (equivalent to the British Legion) made
representations to the local Borough Council. The grave lay in a remote
part of the cemetery that was due to be bulldozed and closed off, being
very close to an eroding cliff. A suggestion that the body be exhumed
and reburied in another area was rejected in favour of a granite
memorial plaque in the Returned Services portion of the cemetery. This
plaque, which was eventually erected the following year, at a cost of 75
New Zealand dollars, reads simply:
In Memory Of
EDWARD ST JOHN DANIEL V.C.
OF BRISTOL, ENGLAND
DIED HOKITIKA 20th MAY 1868
AGED 31 YEARS
The area around Daniel's actual grave
(still unmarked) has now been redeveloped as a park and car park.
The Victoria Cross Warrants have
always included a provision for the restoration of forfeited awards. In
the latest recoding of the rules and ordinances, issued by Queen
Elizabeth II on 30th September 1961, the 15th Article includes the
simple statement:
"it shall be competent for Us, Our Heirs and
Successors, to restore the Decoration when such recommendation has
been withdrawn and with it such pension as may have been
forfeited."
On 24th June 1981, Mr Norman Turnbull
of South Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand sent a petition to H.M. Queen
Elizabeth requesting a pardon and restoration to the Victoria Cross
Registry for Edward St John Daniel. Mr Turnbull argued that Daniel was a
victim of alcoholism and appealed to the Queen’s compassion and
fair-mindedness in giving a sympathetic consideration to the petition.
Mr Turnbull received a reply dated 28th September 1981 from the Official
Secretary to the NZ Governor-General (to whom the Queen’s Private
Secretary had referred the petition). This official reply curtly pointed
out that:
"the restoration of forfeited awards may only
be made on a petition to the Sovereign from the former recipient
himself. In Daniel’s case this is not possible. Furthermore, as your
proposal relates to events so long ago it is considered inappropriate
to reverse the decision made in 1861 by Queen Victoria".
In 1992, radio producer John Armstrong
made contact with VC researcher Victor Tambling of Birmingham, England,
an expert on the eight forfeited VCs. What Victor Tambling had to tell
him was astonishing and subsequently became the focus of Armstrong's
radio documentary "Switched Identity," first broadcast
by BBC Radio Bristol. Mr Tambling showed Armstrong a small sepia
"cabinet photograph," taken in London by Thomas Fall of Baker
St, of a man believed to be Edward St John Daniel. Tambling had bought
the photograph from a reputable dealer as a portrait of Daniel.
The same image is also to be found in
the Imperial War Museum and National Army Museum files on Edward St John
Daniel, which were originally collated by leading VC researcher, the
late Canon William Lummis. What made no sense at all was that although
the photograph bore an uncanny likeness to the known portrait of Daniel
in uniform, it was of a man apparently in his late thirties, or forties.
Subsequent research at the National Museum of Photography, Film and
Television revealed that the photograph was certainly taken after 1865
(when Daniel was in New Zealand) but more than likely after 1875 (seven
years after Daniel's death).
It is known that Canon Lummis had
himself obtained a copy of the cabinet photograph prior to 1956, before
he became aware that there was an earlier photograph of Daniel in
uniform, and before he discovered that Daniel had died in 1868.
Unfortunately he does not say how or from whom he obtained the cabinet
photograph.
In May 2001, a new documentary on the
life and career of Edward St John Daniel was broadcast on New Zealand
national television, as part of the very popular "Epitaph"
series, hosted by Paul Gittins. The documentary had sought the expertise
of Dr Tim Koelmeyer, a leading forensic pathologist, to carry out a
photographic comparison of the bone structure indicated in the portrait
in uniform and the later cabinet photograph. When the two images were
superimposed and carefully compared, Dr Koelmeyer reports:
"I think there's quite a remarkable result here
with the superimposition. If one particularly concentrates on the
position of the eyes, the eye sockets, the jaw and so on - Well, I'm
quite convinced that the portrait and the photograph are one and the
same person".
Victor Tambling's thesis is that at
some time between October 1866 and May 1868, Daniel secretly returned to
England. Having left New Zealand, his identity in that country was then
adopted by another man, who may have found this to be of some personal
advantage. This other man, Tambling believes, is possibly Robert Daniels
of Birmingham who enlisted with the Taranaki Military Settlers in
Melbourne on the very same day as Daniel. Robert Daniels’ Regimental
No. was 427 (Edward St John Daniel’s was 428), and he sailed to New
Zealand with Daniel aboard the Gresham. There is also clear
evidence in the NZ National Archives that information on these two men
has been mixed up.
Another intriguing clue comes from the
celebrated American author Jack London who, in 1902, toured the East End
of London interviewing various characters in the slums and workhouses.
In 1903 he published a non-fiction account of his observations and
interviews in "The People of the Abyss". Chapter 7,
entitled "A Winner of the Victoria Cross," describes
meeting an elderly man who claimed to have joined the Navy as a boy, to
have served in China, Burma, the Crimea and Indian Mutiny, to have won
the Victoria Cross and to have sailed the globe. The man then relates an
incident in which he was insulted by a Lieutenant, who called him a name
that referred to his mother. Enraged, the man struck the Lieutenant with
an iron bar, who then fell into the sea. Jumping in after him,
determined to drown them both, the two men ended up fighting in the
water. For this action, he was court-martialled, stripped of the
Victoria Cross and pension rights, and sent to prison.
Although Jack London's version of
events does not match precisely the career of Edward St John Daniel
(e.g., Daniel was not sent to prison), the number of coincidences in the
story is remarkable. It is especially interesting that one of the
accounts of Daniel's "disgraceful offence" is that he
attempted to drown a fellow officer. If the man's story about winning
and losing the Victoria Cross is true, he could only be Edward St John
Daniel. Who, then, is the man buried at Hokitika? According to Victor
Tambling, it may be Robert Daniels.
A Personal Note
My full name is Michael Inkerman
Daniels. The middle name "Inkerman" is shared by my brother,
father and grandfather. A story, which I remember hearing from my
grandmother as a child, is that this name was given to the males in the
family because a Daniels ancestor had won the Victoria Cross at the
Battle of Inkerman in the Crimean War. Unfortunately my father and
grandfather had both died, and I was therefore unable to confirm this
with them, or to obtain further information.
My interest in Edward St John Daniel
was sparked when I discovered that if the story of my ancestor were
true, that ancestor would have to be Daniel, who had indeed won the VC
at the Battle of Inkerman. Daniel’s family came from Bristol and my
family was based in Bath, only twelve miles away. I also found that I
bear some facial resemblance to Edward St John Daniel.
However, research into my own family
history and that of Edward St John Daniel has failed to establish any
connection at all between the families. My own Daniel(s) ancestors
turned out to be humble agricultural labourers living in the small
isolated (now evacuated and abandoned) village of Imber, on Salisbury
Plain in Wiltshire. Edward St John’s own Daniel ancestors were
well-heeled Bristol attorneys, although the family originally came from
Somerset. It is still possible that there is a distant connection
between the two families, but this would not seem to explain why in 1886
(more than thirty years after the Crimean War) my great grandfather
Henry Daniels, a simple shepherd of Imber, should have named his son
"Inkerman". A search of the 1881 British Census (30 million
people) shows 98 individuals with a forename "Inkerman" or
"Inkermann," over half of whom were born in the three years
immediately following the Battle of Inkerman (1854). None are shown as
born prior to 1853 and only 14 after 1870. A further six people share
the family name "Inkerman," with two of the three men born in
1855 and 1856.
I have so far been unable to discover
any Crimean War connection in any branch of my family, even though this
seems to be the inspiration for the Inkerman name (in 1881, Henry
Daniels had named his first child, a daughter, "Alma," which
is the name of the first Battle of the Crimean War). Several of the
other Inkerman shown in the 1881 Census had a sister named
"Alma". In one family, there were children named "Inkerman,"
"Alma," "Sebastepool," and "Balaclave" (!)
In my case, the precise origins of the
"Inkerman" name remain a mystery. On the other hand, if the
"switched identity" theory is correct and Edward St John
Daniel returned secretly to England sometime between 1866 and 1868, then
this begs a number of intriguing questions. The most important, of
course, are where did he settle and under what name? The research
continues ...
|