|
Australian Military Uniforms
Page 3 |
 |

|
|
Australian Light Horse
WW1 |
Corporal, 2nd AIF |
 |
|
Diggers in 1917 |
 |
South Australian Farrier Sergeant of
the Adelaide Mounted Rifles, wearing the tunic, belt and Martini
bandolier in the 1880s.This portrait in 1899 George GOODALL wears the
uniform of the time, which, was a locally made brown wool tunic and
breeches. The belt is in brown leather, as is the bandolier which
carries the individual rounds for the .303 Lee Metford. The brown
leather equipment was worn by mounted soldiers, while the infantry
militia, known as the Adelaide Rifles wore black leather equipment. |
Once a soldier was placed into
hospital his uniform and kit would be removed and cleaned and stored, he
would then be issued a set of clothing to be worn in the hospital. This
clothing consisted of a blue button up jacket and a pair of blue
trousers, both in a flannel wool. The front panels were lined in a
coloured cotton, and the buttons were a simple cream or white bone. The
German helmet is a souvenir
|
This WW1 digger is wearing the
standard Australian pattern tunic and breeches of WW1. The tunic is
dated 1916 and the breeches are dated 1917. The helmet is a second
pattern Brodie, with the leather chinstrap and 'leatherette' liner. The
leather equipment being worn is a purely Australian made set. |
|
image and text of above photos from Grants
Militaria |
 |
Front
view of two diggers of the 5th Division, 4172 Private (Pte) George James
Giles, 29th Battalion (left) and 4015 Pte John Wallace Anderton, 32nd
Battalion, just out of the trenches, in full kit (with mud), including
webbing with ammunition pouches and entrenching tool.
The gas mask
(small box respirator) is worn at the 'alert' position in front of the
chest.
Pte Wallace has a cloth over his rifle. |
 |
Back
view of two diggers of the 5th Division, 4172 Private (Pte) George James
Giles, 29th Battalion (left) and 4015 Pte John Wallace Anderton, 32nd
Battalion, just out of the trenches, in full kit (with mud).
Pte Wallace
has a cloth over his rifle. Pte Giles has a knife, fork and spoon in his
puttees.
The entire complete uniform and rifle of Pte Giles are held by
the AWM.
|
|
Australian Infantryman wore Pattern
1908 web equipment, and carried wire cutters and other tools The blouse
or tunic, were made of all Australian wool.
The blouses were
loose fitting to allow movement and air to circulate freely.
There were
four large pockets in the front of the tunic as well as an internal
bandage pocket on the inside left front skirt.
A belt was sewn on about
the tunic which had a simple brass buckle to the front, this belt was
made of the same material as the rest of the tunic. At the rear of the
tunic it is heavily pleated with a double fold extending down the spine,
this fold and some extra material across the shoulders were to protect
those areas from the sun.
image and text from Grants
Militaria
|
|
Australian soldiers volunteered and
joined British troops who went to Archangel and Murmansk, in June 1919,
to assist the British, American, French, Italian, Polish, and Serbian
soldiers, who had been there since 1918.
The soldier here is wearing a standard
Australian tunic and breeches, made in England to Australian
specifications. The wool vest, is from Australia, and made of sheep skin
with the fur still attached. The vest was made to be reversible, and was
intended to give some comfort in the cold European winters, this is not
an issue item by one supplied by friends or relatives in Australia. The
fur cap, is a British made item for Arctic use. Made of seal skin fur,
and Bedford cord, it is lined with a heavy cotton and quilted, it
is very warm.
image and text from Grants
Militaria
|
image and text from Grants
Militaria
|
This Light Horseman is wearing the
standard pattern tunic supplied to Australian soldiers. The equipment
worn is the Pattern '03 bandolier equipment. All pieces are Australian
made. The waist belt has a simple open face buckle with one tongue, on
the belt is a bayonet frog for the 1907 pattern bayonet.
Also on the belt are four ammunition
carriers. The two nearest the centre of the belt carry 10 rounds each,
these pouches are duplicates of the pouches on the bandolier, excepting
that they each have a belt loop. Next to these pouches are two 15 round
ammunition pouches. These have small leather tongue that closes the
pouch by attaching to a stud pillar on the top of the front flap. On the
rear of these pouches is also a belt loop, and also a brass 'D ring', for
attaching a great coat carrier for the dismounted infantry. the rear
view shows the other equipment.
Over the right shoulder and hanging at
the left hip are two haversacks.
The large haversack is the pack for this equipment, the Pattern 1903,
Commonwealth Pattern, haversack. The pack is made of a canvas material,
with a two inch shoulder strap with one simple brass friction buckle. On
the rear of this pack is another pocket, this is to hold an emergency
ration tin.
|
image and text from Grants
Militaria
|
The other small haversack is the
carrier for the gas helmet (PH gas hood/helmet), this was a flannel hood
with eye pieces, the material was impregnated with a chemical that would
neutralise the effects of the gas.
Over the other shoulder is the 'mounted' pattern bandolier. This has 9
pouches, each holding 10 rounds each, thus a total of 150 rounds of
.303" were carried; each soldier was also expected to carry a
further 10 rounds in the haversack.
For the light horseman a further 90 rounds would also be carried in
another bandolier slung about his horses neck.
The water bottle is a blue enamelled steel, with a cork stopper, it is
covered in wool, and carried in a leather frame work, also of the
Pattern of 1903. There is a thin leather strap which loops from two
brass rings on the carrier, about the soldier. On this strap is a wide
cotton or web shoulder pad, to spread the load. Although all the leather
pieces of this equipment are Australian made, the web shoulder section
of the water bottle carrier usually carries an English inspectors mark,
as these were imported from Britain, due to Australia's inability to
produce this type of product.
|
 |
 |
| Australia adopted the
English web equipment, Pattern of 1908, shortly after the British army
adopted it. Large quantities of P'08 were sent to Australia in 1912. And
in the beginning of WW1 it was found that the supply and production of
the web equipment could not be relied upon to fill Australia's needs.
Even before Australia's entry to the conflict of the Great War it was
seen that Australia may not be able to rely upon supplies from overseas.
So a localised attempt at reproducing the successful pattern of British
web equipment was trialed. The Australian Government sent out contracts
to reproduce the P'08 in Australian produced leather, almost as soon as
the P'08 equipment was developed. Several tests were carried out, but at
the beginning of WW1, attempts were made in earnest. The Australian P'08
Leather Equipment was an identical copy of the web equipment, early
attempts varied in the type of ammunition pouch closures and securing
methods. Some of this equipment found its way to the battlefields for
testing, photos exist of Diggers wearing versions of the leather
equipment in the early battles around Pozieres 1916, numerous photos
also exist of Australians in training camps in Egypt, and England,
wearing an early version of the equipment.
In 1916 a report of the leather
equipment (known as Australian P'08 Leather Equipment ), condemned it as
lacking when compared with the web P'08. The major complaint was the
equipment stretched and slipped when wet. This problem was attended to
by adding tongues to the two inch buckles and also the one inch buckles
on all the equipment. Despite these modifications the leather equipment
does not seem to have enjoyed much popularity, in the Great War, after
1916, mainly because the British web was readily available and already
tested. The leather equipment continued to see service, but to a lessor
degree. Commonly this equipment is called 'Pattern 1915', or P 15, as
this is generally accepted by most collectors as the date of its first
appearance in any great numbers. Most examples today show manufacture
dates of 1916, and re-issued dates of 1917 and 1918, mainly to
Commonwealth Military Forces units.
wording and
photos from Grants
Militaria
|
|