Unofficial history of the Australian & New Zealand Armed Services 

 Search  &  Help Recruits Military History Hall of Heroes Indigenous Slouch hat + ARMY Today Uniforms Badges

 Colours & Flags Weapons Food Equipment Assorted Medals Armour Navy Air Power 

Nurses - Medical Tributes Poetry - Music Posters & Signs Leaders The Enemy Humour Links Killing Anzac

"....These are the Anzacs; the others may claim  

Their zeal and their spirit, but never their name".

from the ANZAC BOOK 1916


The Protection of Word 'Anzac' Regulations were made in 1921 under the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920 to protect the word 'Anzac', and any word which resembles it, from inappropriate use.

ARL deliberately and knowingly disregard Federal Legislation.

In 2004 in a series of Rugby League matches played in UK the ARL and others used the words ANZAC and ANZACs inappropriately by naming a team The ANZACs and referring to the Anzac Rugby League and to Anzac RL stars.

To add insult to injury it was a second string team of wannabees, not quite good enough to make the National side.

  • It was not casual use. It was ongoing, deliberate use of the word for it's commercial value.
    • The ARL were not unaware of the Regulations. Indeed they claim to have made applications for approval. 
    • The Minister for Veteran's Affairs says that she has no knowledge of these applications and that no approval was granted.
    • If no approval was granted it is a clear breach of the Legislation and ARL should be ashamed. They are not. 
  • Quite the reverse, they see it as their birthright to use the word/s commercially as the father of their CEO was a decorated wartime flyer, some other distant relative was at Gallipoli and lots of players have served over the years.

ARL MUST HAVE KNOWN

  • Image is a copy of a section of Queensland's Courier Mail (daily) newspaper on November 18, 2004

It was nice that the Australian rugby league players had an opportunity to visit the war graves in France (C-M, Nov 17), but I was appalled that the ARL used the acronym Anzac for the Australian-NZ team that played a challenge match in England.  

Anzac means Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (1st. AIF) and belongs to a band of men who faced disease, hardship and gunfire the likes of which we cannot imagine, and did it with amazing courage.  Let's give them the respect they deserve and stop using Anzac indiscriminately. - T. Alexander.

 

Minister Kelly avoids the question for months and then tells porkpies.

On 1 November 2004 I contacted the relevant Minister (Vets Affairs) and asked that the law be applied and the practice stopped.

She totally ignored that contact and 3 phone calls that I made to her Ministerial Office before Christmas. She ignored the fact that I made EVERY member of the House of Representatives and EVERY Senator aware of the matter by email.

I later advised the Prime Minister by email through his web page on 12 November 2004.

On 4 Feb 2005 (84 days later) the Parliamentary Secretary to the PM wrote to me saying that my comments had been "noted" and the Minister for Veterans Affairs would contact me.

On 9 Feb 2005 (100 days after my email) The Hon De-Anne Kelly, Federal Member for Dawson, Minister for Veterans Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence wrote to say (in part);

"I have written to Mr. Geoff Carr, Chief Executive of the ARL, advising him that I have not approved the use of the word 'Anzac' for the team and that the ARL has breached the provisions of the Protection of the Word 'Anzac' Regulations. I expressed my extreme disappointment that the word 'Anzac' was used for such a purpose. I have also requested that the ARL publish an apology on its website."

Firstly that has to be close to a lie. If indeed she was "extremely disappointed" why did she wait 100 days to complain that it had been done when had she acted immediately she could have STOPPED the practice.

Secondly, since when did the Federal Government go around cap in hand asking that people apologise for breaking the law.


Mr. Terry Williams, a spokesman for the ARL and presumably also for Mr. Carr the CEO said;

"After speaking with the Chief Executive of the ARL, Mr. Geoff Carr, I have been asked to raise our concerns regarding the aggressive nature of your email correspondence.

Mr. Carr’s father fought in the Battle of Britain and was awarded the DFC for his bravery in that campaign. Another of his relations, Dave Carr, was part of the landing at Gallipoli and there were hundreds of former players and officials that served in that and later campaigns.

The ARL has done everything possible to seek the appropriate permission to use the term “Anzac” from the Dept of Veterans Affairs. On behalf of the many former players that have served in the Armed Forces in both world wars we are offended by your suggestion that we have used the term inappropriately and would point out that we are, again, going through the correct channels to gain the necessary permission for the future.

We shall continue to go through the correct channels for permission and the sanctity of the term “Anzac” will always be a priority for the Australian Rugby League. When permission has been granted previously for the use of the term we have contributed significantly to projects such as the Kokoda Track Memorial at Concord . Although we will not be using the term “Anzac” for the April Test, we are in discussions with Veterans Affairs about an appropriate contribution to a further Veterans Project.

The curtain raiser to the April Test will be a game between the Australian Armed Forces and the New Zealand Armed Forces, both groups are committed to commemorating the 90th anniversary of Gallipoli. We respect the Armed Services involvement and their contribution to the event will be appropriate. While we will not be using the term “Anzac” ourselves, we cannot be responsible for others who may wish to refer to the game as the Anzac Test given the Armed Services involvement."

Now, if all that is true, the Minister is badly mistaken or a liar. If the Minister is being honest the ARL are not. They cannot both be telling the truth.


In another email Mr. Williams says:

"The New Zealand government has approved the use of the word and the ARL has always complied with the necessary regulations regarding the use of the term."

  • I am not yet ready to call Mr. Williams a liar but...

    • It would go against all previous experience for the NZ Government to approve the use in these terms. They are much more protective of "ANZAC" than the Australian Government. I will ask them.

    • Mr. Williams declines the opportunity to provide me with a copy of the NZ "approval".

EITHER WAY, THE COMMERCIALIZATION OF ANZAC MUST STOP.

Mr. Carr and Mr. Williams of the ARL totally miss the point that the reasons they use to "justify" their illegal commercial use of the word ANZAC might equally apply to Tamatha T. Titswobble, the owner of a sleazy massage parlour and brothel who will now rename her establishment

ANZAC MASSAGE PARLOUR & BROTHEL

Where sons of Anzacs get REAL active service.

Maybe it would be a good place for after match footballers to congregate.


  • Contact emails:

De-Anne Kelly, MP Minister for Veterans' Affairs. de-anne.kelly.mp@aph.gov.au

Mr. Terry Williams, ARL spokesman, tezza@nswrl.com.au 

Ted Harris Webmaster tedharris@ozemail.com.au 

Minister Kelly and Mr. Williams are both invited to add to our store of knowledge in this matter. Their replies, if any, will be added verbatim.
More details. to go to Killing Anzac
 

Statistics : Over 35 million page visitors since  11 Nov 2002  

 

Email  

 Search   Help     Guestbook   Get Updates   Last Post    The Ode      FAQ     Digger Forum

Click for news

Digger History:  an unofficial history of the Australian & New Zealand Armed Forces